The modifier has to come before the foreground color name, separated
by a comma, and after 'bold,' (when present). This has no effect on
terminals that are incapable of cursive text, like the Linux console.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56525.
Names give a rough idea of what the color will look like, whereas
numerical indexes would not do this at all.
Nine extra colors seems enough. If there were more, no one would be
able to say for sure which is which when two similar colors are used
several rows apart.
This partially fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56445.
After a year or so, when people have had time to convert their syntaxes
to use 'bold' and/or 'light' instead of 'bright', we can drop this
colorizing, and still later stop recognizing 'bright' altogether.
A background color *can* be bright (in the sense of lighter, shinier).
It's just that the background cannot be bold. Only the typeface used
on the foreground can be bold (if the terminal supports it). So, let
"bright", when used with a background color, simply mean "light".
This makes it possible to avoid the misnamed prefix "bright". It is
misnamed because (on current terminal emulators, when the brightening
of bold is switched off) it just makes the typeface bold, not the color
brighter. The prefix "light" will now only make the color brigther,
and the modifier "bold" will just make the typeface bold (on terminal
emulators, when the brightening of bold is switched off).
On a Linux console, which is not capable of bolding the typeface,
"bold" will brighten the color.
This fully fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58503.
The prefix "bright" will continue to make the color brighter AND/OR
make the typeface bold (depending on how the terminal is configured
and on its capabilities), but the prefix "light" will just make the
color brighter (if the terminal can do that).
The prefix "bright" continues to do the same as what it did before,
to not change the appearance of user-defined syntaxes. And having
an option to change the meaning of "bright"... would be confusing.
This partially fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58503.
By default, the position indicator is off. It can be turned on
by passing -q or --indicator on the command line, or by adding
'set indicator' in your nanorc file.
(Unfortunately, this means that ^L cannot be used for the
Linter in the "Execute Command" menu.)
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58469.
Bug existed since around version 2.1.0.
In the past, when Speller and Linter and Formatter were all bound
to ^T (later ones taking priority), it was easier to exclude also
the formatter code when --disable-speller was used. But since the
formatter was reintroduced (in commit 34170611) and bound to its
own keystroke (M-F), this is no longer the case.
A long option should describe what it does, not vaguely hint at it.
Also, in several places of nano's code we deal with actual temp files,
and then having a flag called TEMP_FILE that doesn't have anything to
do with temp files is somewhat confusing.
With the 'bookmark' function, the user can place a bookmark on any
line in the buffer. Multiple lines can be bookmarked in this way.
With 'prevbookmark' and 'nextbookmark', the user can then easily
return to the bookmarked lines. The search for a bookmark wraps
around, as if start and end of buffer are connected.
[However, in this implementation, when a bookmarked line is deleted,
the bookmark is deleted too. This is undesirable. Also, when such
a deleted line is pasted elsewhere, the bookmark reappears with it,
and when pasted multiple times, the bookmark will be there as many
times. This is thoroughly undesirable. These behaviors will be
changed in a later commit.]
A bookmark is not yet visible in any way.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57577.
Requested-by: Ken Tyler <kent@werple.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@telfort.nl>
If the user really wants to match anything, ".*" should be used.
(This also stops nano looking at the rest of the line as soon as an
empty regular expression is encountered. This may seem like poorer
feedback than before, but... I think that multiple error messages
per line are more confusing than helpful.)
This fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57942.
Bug existed since before version 2.2.0.
When copy-pasting has resulted in a nanorc file with DOS line endings
(CR+LF), then silently ignore the carriage return, to avoid printing
an error message that partly overwrites itself.
This fulfills https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57756.
Requested-by: Matthias Aßhauer <mha1993@live.de>
A control code cannot be a Meta keystroke, and a plain printable
character as key code necessarily means it is a Meta keystroke.
So, comparing just the key code is enough.
