rexy712/nano-with-linefolding
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

input: robustness is good, but dropping a key code is not a good idea

Browse Source 
If (on a bogged-down computer) a paste goes so slow that the bytes
come in one by one, nano shouldn't discard any of them -- the user
is unlikely to appreciate this.  Just switch the bracketed paste
off, for the possibility that the closing sequence went missing,
and accept that this closing sequence gets pasted into the buffer.
This commit is contained in:
Benno Schulenberg 2025-03-05 12:01:07 +01:00
parent f8de98f7cd
commit 934d122dd4
1 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
src/nano.c
View File

@ -1440,19 +1440,22 @@ void suck_up_input_and_paste_it(void)
{
linestruct *was_cutbuffer = cutbuffer;
linestruct *line = make_new_node(NULL);
size_t were_waiting = 0;
size_t index = 0;
int input = ERR;
line->data = copy_of("");
cutbuffer = line;
while (bracketed_paste) {
size_t were_waiting = waiting_keycodes();
int input = get_kbinput(midwin, BLIND);
were_waiting = waiting_keycodes();
input = get_kbinput(midwin, BLIND);
/* If key codes come singly, something is wrong. */
if (were_waiting == 0 && waiting_keycodes() == 0)
break;
else if (input == '\r' || input == '\n') {
bracketed_paste = FALSE;
if (input == '\r' || input == '\n') {
line->next = make_new_node(line);
line = line->next;
line->data = copy_of("");
@ -1463,7 +1466,7 @@ void suck_up_input_and_paste_it(void)
line->data[index++] = (char)input;
line->data[index] = '\0';
} else if (input != BRACKETED_PASTE_MARKER)
break;
bracketed_paste = FALSE;
}
if (ISSET(VIEW_MODE))
@ -1471,10 +1474,8 @@ void suck_up_input_and_paste_it(void)
else
paste_text();
if (bracketed_paste) {
if (were_waiting == 0 || input == FOREIGN_SEQUENCE)
statusline(ALERT, _("Flawed paste"));
bracketed_paste = FALSE;
}
free_lines(cutbuffer);
cutbuffer = was_cutbuffer;