mirror of
https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo.git
synced 2026-07-30 22:48:07 -07:00
83 lines
3.4 KiB
Diff
83 lines
3.4 KiB
Diff
From ab486df804b0b306d2b1d407eec5185bcdd40543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Michael Waskom <mwaskom@gmail.com>
|
|
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 20:52:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] Address np.in1d deprecation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
tests/test_categorical.py | 2 +-
|
|
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/tests/test_categorical.py b/tests/test_categorical.py
|
|
index 3df7824787..21db60beb7 100644
|
|
--- a/tests/test_categorical.py
|
|
+++ b/tests/test_categorical.py
|
|
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ def check_boxen(self, patches, data, orient, pos, width=0.8):
|
|
|
|
assert verts[pos_idx].min().round(4) >= np.round(pos - width / 2, 4)
|
|
assert verts[pos_idx].max().round(4) <= np.round(pos + width / 2, 4)
|
|
- assert np.in1d(
|
|
+ assert np.isin(
|
|
np.percentile(data, [25, 75]).round(4), verts[val_idx].round(4).flat
|
|
).all()
|
|
assert_array_equal(verts[val_idx, 1:, 0], verts[val_idx, :-1, 2])
|
|
|
|
From 2eada7ee9f69a97b43c7c6b41b3c56feb756a5c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Michael Waskom <mwaskom@gmail.com>
|
|
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 07:23:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] Fix tick visibility introspection on 3.10
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
tests/_core/test_plot.py | 25 +++++++++++++------------
|
|
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/tests/_core/test_plot.py b/tests/_core/test_plot.py
|
|
index 5554ea650f..50851646cf 100644
|
|
--- a/tests/_core/test_plot.py
|
|
+++ b/tests/_core/test_plot.py
|
|
@@ -1782,6 +1782,17 @@ def test_labels(self, long_df):
|
|
|
|
class TestLabelVisibility:
|
|
|
|
+ def has_xaxis_labels(self, ax):
|
|
+ if _version_predates(mpl, "3.7"):
|
|
+ # mpl3.7 added a getter for tick params, but both yaxis and xaxis return
|
|
+ # the same entry of "labelleft" instead of "labelbottom" for xaxis
|
|
+ return len(ax.get_xticklabels()) > 0
|
|
+ elif _version_predates(mpl, "3.10"):
|
|
+ # Then I guess they made it labelbottom in 3.10?
|
|
+ return ax.xaxis.get_tick_params()["labelleft"]
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ return ax.xaxis.get_tick_params()["labelbottom"]
|
|
+
|
|
def test_single_subplot(self, long_df):
|
|
|
|
x, y = "a", "z"
|
|
@@ -1852,12 +1863,7 @@ def test_1d_column_wrapped(self):
|
|
for s in subplots[1:]:
|
|
ax = s["ax"]
|
|
assert ax.xaxis.get_label().get_visible()
|
|
- # mpl3.7 added a getter for tick params, but both yaxis and xaxis return
|
|
- # the same entry of "labelleft" instead of "labelbottom" for xaxis
|
|
- if not _version_predates(mpl, "3.7"):
|
|
- assert ax.xaxis.get_tick_params()["labelleft"]
|
|
- else:
|
|
- assert len(ax.get_xticklabels()) > 0
|
|
+ assert self.has_xaxis_labels(ax)
|
|
assert all(t.get_visible() for t in ax.get_xticklabels())
|
|
|
|
for s in subplots[1:-1]:
|
|
@@ -1882,12 +1888,7 @@ def test_1d_row_wrapped(self):
|
|
for s in subplots[-2:]:
|
|
ax = s["ax"]
|
|
assert ax.xaxis.get_label().get_visible()
|
|
- # mpl3.7 added a getter for tick params, but both yaxis and xaxis return
|
|
- # the same entry of "labelleft" instead of "labelbottom" for xaxis
|
|
- if not _version_predates(mpl, "3.7"):
|
|
- assert ax.xaxis.get_tick_params()["labelleft"]
|
|
- else:
|
|
- assert len(ax.get_xticklabels()) > 0
|
|
+ assert self.has_xaxis_labels(ax)
|
|
assert all(t.get_visible() for t in ax.get_xticklabels())
|
|
|
|
for s in subplots[:-2]:
|